CategoriesHEDA News

HEDA Demands EFCC Investigation into Non-Executed Contracts in Ondo Community

The Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA Resource Centre) has called on the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to investigate and prosecute Gallet Nigeria Limited and Dredging Atlantic for failing to execute shoreline protection contracts in Ayetoro Community, Ondo State. In a petition to Mr. Olanipekun Olukoyede, EFCC Executive Chairman, HEDA’s Executive Secretary, Mr. Sulaimon Arigbabu, expressed concern over the worsening environmental and socio-economic crisis in the community. Oil exploration has caused significant land loss to Atlantic Ocean incursions, leaving many residents homeless and disrupting their livelihoods. In 2004, the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) awarded a ₦2.5 billion contract to Gallet Nigeria Limited, with a ₦650 million mobilization fee, to address shoreline erosion. After four years of non-execution, the contract was terminated. It was re-awarded in 2009 to Dredging Atlantic for ₦6.5 billion, with a ₦2.5 billion mobilization fee, but the project remained incomplete. HEDA highlighted the devastating impact of these failed contracts on Ayetoro, including displacement of residents and worsening climate challenges. The organization warned that continued neglect poses a broader threat to Nigeria’s coastal communities, potentially leading to submersion of cities along the Atlantic coastline. The civil society group urged the anti-graft agency to thoroughly investigate Gallet Nigeria Limited and Dredging Atlantic, prosecute those responsible, and recover misappropriated funds to address the community’s needs. “This is a clear case of how corruption deprives communities of essential resources while compounding environmental and socio-economic hardships,” said Arigbabu. “The EFCC must act decisively to restore accountability and bring justice to Ayetoro Community.” HEDA commended the EFCC for its anti-corruption efforts and expressed hope for swift resolution, alleviation of Ayetoro residents’ suffering, and safeguarding of Nigeria’s coastal regions. The organization reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, public accountability, and environmental justice, urging stakeholders to protect Ayetoro Community and ensure a sustainable future.

CategoriesHEDA News

HEDA Calls for Transparency in the Outcomes of Senate Hearing on Subsidy Funds and Budget Performance

The Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA Resource Centre) urges the Nigeria Senate Committee on Appropriation, chaired by Senator Solomon Olamilekan, to prioritize transparency and accountability in the recent Senate hearing involving the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Mr. Wale Edun. In a statement signed by HEDA’s Chairman, Olanrewaju Suraju, the organization expressed serious concerns over key financial issues raised by the Senate committee, such as savings and expenditures from the removal of the fuel subsidy and debt servicing, and urged the Senate to ensure comprehensive investigations, and make the findings publicly accessible. According to Suraju, the Nigerian public have the right to know how their resources are being managed, particularly during economic challenges. He further emphasized the need for the Minister to provide detailed accounts of the savings and expenditures from subsidy removal to the Parliament, clearly outline debt servicing costs for 2024, and provide projections for 2025. The civil society organization also expressed disappointment in the apparent lack of readiness displayed by some public officials during the public hearing, and their sudden demand for closed door session with the parliamentary committee, stating that it undermines public trust in governance. “Closed-door sessions must not become a means of avoiding public accountability. Transparency in these matters is critical for fostering good governance and restoring citizens’ confidence in government institutions,” the statement added. HEDA further called on the Federal Government to enhance its public communication efforts by providing regular updates on the management of national resources. It further demands the monthly publication of FAAC allocations of the Federation across the three tiers of government. The organization reaffirmed its commitment to promoting transparency, accountability, and inclusive governance.

CategoriesHEDA News

HEDA X-SPACE: Sowore to Speak on 2024 Human Rights Abuse in Nigeria

The Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA Resource Centre) is thrilled to announce the January 2025 edition of its Monthly Advocacy Series (MAS), a highly impactful virtual platform dedicated to addressing Nigeria’s most pressing national issues. This monthly series, tagged “Chatting with HEDA,” will feature the esteemed human rights activist and founder of Sahara Reporters, Mr. Omoyele Sowore, as the guest speaker. Scheduled for Wednesday, January 15, 2025, from 4:00 PM to 5:00 PM (Nigeria time) on X (formerly Twitter) Space, the session will delve into the theme: “2024 Review of Human Rights Abuse in Nigeria.” This promises to be an engaging and illuminating discussion that will shed light on the ongoing challenges of human rights violations, political clampdowns, and the misuse of the Cybercrime Act by law enforcement agencies. This interactive program provides a unique opportunity for Mr. Sowore to share his invaluable perspectives on these critical issues, drawing from his personal experiences with political victimization and his unwavering commitment to advancing human rights and democracy. Participants can look forward to a rich discussion moderated by HEDA, featuring a 30-minute conversation, a 20-minute Q&A session, and 10 minutes dedicated to closing remarks and acknowledgments. HEDA Resource Centre remains steadfast in its mission to promote good governance, transparency, human rights, and sustainable development in Nigeria. The Monthly Advocacy Series is a cornerstone of this mission, bringing together thought leaders, activists, and the public to address issues vital to national development. We invite members of the public, civil society organizations, policymakers, and the media to join this critical conversation via HEDA’s X Page @Hedagenda on Wednesday. January 15, 2025, at 4pm.  

CategoriesHEDA News

Oil and Gas Exploration: 70% of Bayelsa Residents Blame Oil Activities for Pollution; 79% Suffer Health Issues, 82% Criticize Government Response – HEDA Report

–  CSO Demands effective remediation efforts, greater accountability from IOCs, FG A recent report by the Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA Resource Centre) has highlighted the severe impact of oil and environmental pollution in Bayelsa State, one of the oil-producing states in the Niger Delta region. The report, titled “Report of On-the-Spot Assessment of Oil and Gas Exploration Activities in Bayelsa State, Nigeria,” provides a detailed account of the detrimental effects of frequent oil exploitation, spills and pollution in Bayelsa. The findings reveal a significant reduction in agricultural productivity, increasing contamination of water resources, and loss of biodiversity, leading to long-term ecosystem damage and the disappearance of traditional medicinal plants. The comprehensive survey, which involved 289 respondents from all eight local government areas in Bayelsa State, including Brass, Ekremor, Lolokuma/Opokuma, Nembe, Ogbia, Sagbama, Southern Ijaw, and Yenagoa, found that 70.2% of respondents believe that oil and gas activities have significantly contributed to environmental pollution and degradation in the State. Water pollution was reported by 55.7% of respondents, making it the most prevalent type of pollution experienced. This was followed by air pollution (23.18%), soil pollution (15.92%), and other types of pollution (4.84%). The research also discovered that majority of respondents 79.24% and their families in each of the local government areas experience negative health effects due to oil pollution in their communities. The local government areas of Kolokuma/Opokuma, Nembe, and Yenagoa, which have a high number of oil installations, reported particularly high levels of health issues. On the question of government accountability, 70.24% of respondents believe that the government does not hold oil and gas companies accountable for environmental damage, while only 20.42% expressed that they are somewhat accountable, and 9.34% said they are highly accountable. Additionally, 54.86% of respondents believe that companies can adequately address concerns related to land degradation or deforestation resulting from oil and gas activities. In terms of government responsiveness, 81.94% of respondents are not satisfied with the response of federal government agencies to environmental concerns raised by the affected communities. Furthermore, 75.26% do not believe that government agencies effectively oversee and enforce regulations to protect the rights of the community. The report also evaluated the handling of oil and gas asset divestment by Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) and Nigerian Agip Oil Company (NAOC) in Bayelsa State. Respondents rated the divestment handling as poor (67.13%), fair (18.34%), not available (8.65%), good (5.19%), and excellent (0.69%). Similarly, 72.32% of respondents rated the transparency of International Oil Companies (IOCs) in communicating processes as poor, while 12.80% rated it fair, 5.54% good, 0.35% excellent, and 9.00% not available. Local community involvement in the divestment process was also assessed, with 41.52% of respondents stating that they are not involved at all, 39.79% not very involved, 12.11% somewhat involved, and 0.69% very involved. Regarding the perception of companies’ responsiveness to citizens’ concerns and feedback on divestment, 42.56% of respondents said they are not responsive at all, 25.26% not very responsive, and only 1.73% found them responsive. When asked about their awareness of the Nigerian Upstream Petroleum Regulatory Commission (NUPRC) checklist, 73% of respondents said they do not know about the NUPRC checklist, while 27% said they are aware and have access to it. Focus Group Discussions conducted as part of the research highlighted several critical issues, including environmental catastrophes, severe impacts on respondents’ livelihoods, human rights violations, health crises, and socio-cultural degradation. The focus group discussions underscored the urgent need for infrastructural maintenance to prevent such failures. Meanwhile, HEDA’s Chairman, Olanrewaju Suraju emphasized the need for urgent action, stating, “The NUPRC should enforce environmental regulations with stricter penalties for non-compliant IOCs. Increased funding and ensuring transparency in remediation efforts are essential. Regular engagement between IOCs, government agencies, and communities should be mandated, along with the development of community-led monitoring initiatives. “Launching comprehensive health programs and conducting long-term health studies are vital. Sustainable livelihood programs, and fair compensation for affected communities should be prioritized. Strengthening anti-corruption frameworks with technology for transparency is crucial.” The report’s findings are stark reminders of the ecological and economic sustainability challenges facing Bayelsa State. As Suraju noted, “The findings of this research highlight the urgent need for comprehensive and effective remediation efforts, stronger regulatory enforcement, and greater accountability from both IOCs and government bodies. These measures are crucial for evaluating the effectiveness and impact of leases in various capacities and guiding development, enhancing accountability, and informing stakeholders.” The full report of the “On-the-Spot Assessment of Oil and Gas Exploration Activities in Bayelsa State, Nigeria” is available on the HEDA website and can be downloaded here (Report of On-the-Spot Assessment of Oil and Gas Exploration Activities in Bayelsa State, Nigeria – HEDA Resource Centre). The report offers valuable insights to inform discussions, policies, and decisions shaping the nation’s future.

CategoriesHEDA News

The Nigerian Institute of International Affairs

The Nigerian Institute of International Affairs (NIIA) finds itself embroiled in a demand for a refund totaling N2,475,000 from the Human and Environmental Development Agenda (HEDA Resource Centre) following a contentious publishing agreement that remains unfulfilled. In a letter dated 10th January 2024, Olanrewaju Suraju, Chairman of HEDA, directed to Prof. Eghosa E. Osaghae, Director-General of NIIA, demanding the reimbursement of the aforementioned amount. The sum was remitted to the Nigerian Institute of International Affairs for the publication of a book titled “FIVE DECADES OF UNIFIED SINO-NIGERIA ENGAGEMENT,” as mutually agreed upon between HEDA Resource Centre consultant and NIIA, represented respectively by Dr. Gbenga Oduntan and Prof. Efem N. Ubi. As per the provided correspondence, NIIA issued a quotation dated 27th February 2023, valuing the publication at N2,450,000. Subsequently, on May 29th, 2023, HEDA Resource Centre transferred a total of N2,475,000 to NIIA’s account, documented by a remita payment receipt. Despite the receipt of payment, NIIA failed to honor its end of the agreement, citing delays in retrieving funds from the Federal Government of Nigeria’s Treasury Single Account, where the payment was deposited. NIIA acknowledged that the retrieval process could span between two to three months. However, as of the letter’s date, more than seven months have elapsed without any substantive progress or communication from NIIA, except for repetitive excuses. Suraju contends that the delay has severely impacted HEDA Resource Centre’s partnership with an international organization, which anticipated the publication’s completion by September 2023—an aspect communicated to Prof. Ubi prior to payment. In response, HEDA Resource Centre demands the full refund of N2,475,000 within 14 days of receiving the letter. The refund should be directed to the organization’s bank account at Guaranty Trust Bank. Failure to comply within the stipulated period may prompt legal action against NIIA. This dispute underscores the challenges inherent in contractual engagements, particularly in ensuring the timely fulfillment of obligations by revenue generating agencies of government, and attempts by suspected officials to prevent revenue generation through the Treasury Single Accounts.

CategoriesHEDA News

World Environment Day 2023 “Beat Plastic Pollution” – ARTICLE BY: CECILIA OGWUCHE

Plastic pollution has emerged as a grave environmental problem on a global scale, with far-reaching consequences for ecosystems, wildlife, and human health. The rapid production and consumption of plastics, coupled with inadequate waste management systems, have led to the accumulation of plastic waste in various habitats, including oceans, rivers, and landfills. According to the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), 300 Million Tonnes of Plastic is produced every year, and not all of it is recycled. To put in perspective, that is equivalent to the weight of the entire human population. While some countries and cities around the world have enforced plastic bans, and the call for the end of single-use plastics is at an all-time high, more still needs to be done. It is up to us consumers to understand the impact that our plastic consumption is having on the environment. This year’s World Environment Day theme, “Beat Plastic Pollution,” highlights the urgent need to tackle the global issue of plastic pollution. It encourages individuals to rethink their consumption habits and make conscious choices to reduce their plastic footprint. It calls for the promotion of the 3R approach: Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle. By reducing the use of single-use plastics, reusing plastic items whenever possible, and ensuring proper recycling of plastic waste, we can significantly minimize the amount of plastic that ends up in landfills, water bodies, and natural habitats. At the fifth session of the United Nations Environment Assembly in February 2022, the UNEA Resolution 5/14 titled “End Plastic Pollution: Towards An International Legally Binding Instrument” was adopted to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment with the ambition to complete the negotiations by end of 2024. The instrument is to be based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full life cycle of plastic. It is based on this that the “Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee” is currently meeting at the the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Headquarters in Paris, France to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment (INC-2). Plastic pollution poses a significant environmental challenge in Africa, with Nigeria being one of the countries greatly affected. In particular, the use and disposal of Styrofoam and plastic bottles have emerged as major contributors to the plastic waste crisis in the country, resulting to detrimental impact on the environment and the urgent need for sustainable solutions. With about 2.5 million tons of plastic waste annually, Nigeria ranks ninth globally among countries with the highest contributions to plastic pollution. Unfortunately, over 88% of the plastic waste generated in Nigeria is not recycled. Instead, much of it ends up in water bodies – rivers, lakes, drains, lagoons and the ocean. Styrofoam disposable food plates for example, have gained popularity in Nigeria due to their affordability and convenience. However, their improper disposal poses a severe threat to the environment. These plates are non-biodegradable and persist in the environment for hundreds of years. Improperly discarded Styrofoam plates often end up in drainage systems, clogging them and contributing to flooding during the rainy season. Furthermore, they are often burnt alongside other waste, releasing toxic pollutants into the air and causing air pollution. The accumulation of Styrofoam waste also affects soil health, inhibiting plant growth and agricultural productivity. Styrofoam waste, particularly in the form of food plates, poses a risk to wildlife and marine ecosystems. Animals may mistake Styrofoam for food and consume it, leading to health issues, blockages in their digestive systems, and even death. To tackle the problems associated with Styrofoam in Nigeria, several measures can be taken and they are; Promote Alternatives: Encourage the use of biodegradable or compostable alternatives to Styrofoam plates, such as plates made from plant-based materials like sugarcane fiber or palm leaf. These are eco-friendly, biodegradable, and do not have the same adverse impacts on the environment. Implement Waste Management Systems: Improve waste management systems and infrastructure to ensure proper collection, sorting, and recycling of Styrofoam waste. Raise Awareness: Conduct awareness campaigns and educational programs to inform the public about the environmental impacts of Styrofoam and the importance of proper waste management, and encourage individuals and businesses to make sustainable choices and support initiatives that promote environmentally friendly alternatives. Enforce Regulations: Strengthen regulations and enforce bans or restrictions on the production, importation, and use of Styrofoam products. Implement penalties for non-compliance to discourage the use and improper disposal of Styrofoam plates. By addressing the problems associated with Styrofoam in Nigeria, specifically disposable food plates, the country can make significant progress in reducing plastic pollution, protecting the environment, and ensuring a sustainable future for generations to come. Another significant contribution to Plastic Pollution in Nigeria is plastic bottles particularly single-use ones. The consumption of bottled water and other beverages has increased dramatically in recent years, leading to a surge in plastic bottle waste. Improper disposal of these bottles results in littering of streets, drainage systems, and water bodies. Plastic bottles take hundreds of years to decompose, contaminating soil and water resources and posing threats to aquatic life. For instance, the popular “pure water” sachets, which are often sold in plastic bottles, are frequently found littered along roadsides and in waterways, contributing to the plastic pollution crisis. Addressing plastic pollution requires concerted global action. Individuals can make a difference by adopting sustainable practices such as reducing single-use plastic consumption, recycling, and properly disposing of waste. However, systemic changes are needed to tackle the root causes of plastic pollution. Governments must implement effective waste management systems, promote recycling infrastructure, and enforce regulations to reduce plastic waste generation. International collaborations and agreements, such as the United Nations’ Clean Seas campaign, are crucial in raising awareness, setting targets, and implementing policies to combat plastic pollution. The Nigerian government has taken some steps to address plastic pollution, including the imposition of a ban on the production and use of non-biodegradable plastics in some states. For instance, In May 2019, the Nigerian government passed the “Plastic Bags Prohibition Bill 2018”, joining other governments that have